EVE Search - Amarr Mk II

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Amarr Mk II

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Mechalus Kal'lith	Posted - 2006.12.12 13:04:00 - [1] Originally by: Goumindong Maller 6 lows, 1 EAN II Thorax 5 lows, 1 Mag Stab II+ W/ similar fitting, MAR/EAN/DC tank. Maller= MAR/EAN/EAN/DC/HS/HS Thorax= MAR/EAN/EAN/DC/MS Benefit Maller = 1 heat sink [+20% dmg], +25% resistance Benefit Thorax = +25% DMG, +33% cap rchg[18% size adv] It has a 1 low slot advantage, not a two low slot advantage, you cannot say the EANMII is a "low slot advantage" and then ignore the damage bonus on the Thorax as a low slot advantage You want to compare over tanking a Thorax with tanking a Maller, and I want to compare similar setups. That is the problem. If i stick a bunch of HSs in the low of the Maller and the Thorax it doesnt change the base relationship of the bonus. Ergo, i could set them up in the lows like Maller: MARII/DC/HS/HS/HS/HS Thorax: MARII/DC/MS/MS/MS In this situation the Thorax has the slot advantage once you do the math on the amount of extra damage mods compared to extra EAN's each bonus is. Comparing it in any other way to the 1/1 ratio makes no sense. Also, Blasters track 60% better than pulse lasers[its even better comparing the smaller weapons], a 37.5% bonus gets them close to autocannons not blasters. The extra mid slot on the maller[and the removal of the high] doesnt make the ship gank better than it already does, it does make it last a bit longer[if you can fit the right modules], and it does imporve its ability to be a laser boat.. Quote: Also, i thought pulse lasers optimal for the Amarrian battleships were around 20km, and if you're using a multi lens, then w/ falloff + opt, you should get 20km anyway. As far as i know, disruptors have a range of 20km. Also, don't tell me that the bc's/cruisers don't have the speed to get away. with your extra lows, you can't afford to put on nano's? With 1 nano in maller, it'd move just a fast, or faster w/ the navigation skills, w/o the mwd/AB. Ammaran BS's need to stay outside of 20km in order to keep their damage advantage at any decent transversal. And no, you cannot effectivly nano/MWD a maller and keep your cap up to keep shooting at at things, and if you dont have an MWD, you cant escape even the slower ships with MWD's And once again on top of all that, the maller has (oh my what a big surprise) less cpu. So I seriously would like to know what the devs where thinking when making this ship. 2 more slots then a thorax, lasers that eat more cpu, and then give it less cpu And indeed, its near impossible to keep enemy ships at your optimal range as amarr. webbers simply don't reach out 20km MK

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.